Frisian Energy Table: Lessons from Denmark on Sustainable Heating
At the Friese Energie Tafel (Frisian Governance representatives) on May 20, we looked back on the knowledge exchange trip to Denmark, where the central theme was district heating. The visit provided deep insights into sustainable heating practices and sparked valuable conversations between Dutch and Danish stakeholders.
One of the takeaways was the role of potential maps—tools that identify promising areas for district heating. Both Denmark and municipalities like Súdwest-Fryslân are actively developing these. While there’s much to learn from one another, differences remain. For example, where the Netherlands struggles with grid congestion, Denmark uses flexible sources like high-capacity electric boilers.
Regulatory frameworks also differ significantly. Denmark’s lighter legislation allows for more streamlined investments. Remarkably, district heating projects there can be financed with 100% external capital—something that’s restricted in the Netherlands, partly due to eurozone constraints. (This is linked to financial guidelines around "EVOs", which are detailed in the confidence report shared with participants.)
That said, the business case for district heating is becoming more complex. Installation costs are rising due to soaring material prices. Older, narrow pipelines are being dug up and replaced with wider ones to meet increased demand—adding both time and expense. Yet, district heating remains a more inclusive solution: unlike individual heat pumps, which are only viable for wealthier households, heat networks offer sustainable warmth for all.
In Denmark, the guiding principle is clear: Always start with district heating. Only consider individual solutions if there is truly no other way. An inspiring approach that aligns with our collective goal: making sustainable heating accessible and affordable for everyone.